|
Chapter Seven
Conclusions and Implications for First Nations
Ethnography has constructed an object of knowledge ("culture")
that has remained relatively constant across changes in
theoretical positions and interpretive methods. This object, and
the means by which it is constructed, is situated within
networks of power and what Michel Foucault refers to as "regimes
of truth." The ethnographic text is thus made possible only by
certain historical, political, and epistemological contexts. The
study of indigenous media, with its often uncritical
appropriation of ethnographic discourse, must be located in
reference to the historical specificity of this discourse and to
the "practical politics" of colonization and domination.
The historical experience of culture contact and conflict
between colonizing Europeans and the aboriginal population of
North America shape the ways in which First Nations communities
today have appropriated and developed the forms of mass media.
This history has also shaped the way cultural differences are
experienced, imagined, and represented within and between these
two groups. The current struggle for access to media and the
discursive frames within which this struggle is analyzed have
common roots in modes of domination. (Bredin 1993)
We as a society cannot afford further divisions between the
information haves and have-nots. A gap in the availability of
Internet access will have a multiplier effect and create an even
more significant divide in critical areas such as education, job
training, literacy, public health and economic prosperity. (Tim
Koogle, Chairman and CEO of Yahoo!, at the G-8 Kyushu-Okinawa
Summit 2000)
Today in Canada an era of limited political autonomy
has occurred and there is strong movement toward self-determination,
healing, and expression of Native perspectives. The colonial
policies carried out against Natives of North America for the last
500 years have not worked. In particular, Natives in Canada and
elsewhere are surviving and thriving, and a strong movement toward
self-determination is in process (Frideres 2001, RCAP 1995, Mercredi
1993, Fleras and Elliott 1992).
The data in this dissertation demonstrate that
cyberspace is empowering to First Nations, at this time. Pockets of
communications, such as Frosty's, alt.native, thousands of websites,
are establishing territory in cyberspace.
First Nations in Canada need to take a proactive
approach to the use of cyberspace; this new territory-in-process is
a chance to refine and redefine Native and non-Native priorities.
One of the strongest of the new tools is Information Technology
(IT). It enables communications from the margins to the centre, it
can help with preservation of oral culture and language: "With a
multimedia computer the Internet becomes a multimedia system,
featuring sound and graphics and videoÉ" Cyberspace allows remote
communities to communicate and access the latest information, it can
support culture, and "our Nations will be able to speak more quickly
and directly than ever before" on the Internet (Morrisson 1995).
The year 2003 marks the end of the UN's Decade of
Indigenous Peoples. But it is just a beginning in cyberspace, and
this thought from a decade ago still applies:
I agree with Gerald McMaster that 1992 (Columbus' Quincentenary)
was a year for reflection on ourselves, on who we are, and how
we are all represented in the discourse of history and art and
literature, feminism and resistance, land rights, treaty rights,
sovereignty, and self-determination. In 1993, the International
Year of Indigenous Peoples, we must recognize -- and act upon --
the intertwined past and present of our two worlds, our parallel
voices. (Valaskakis 1993)
How can Natives find unique ways to use the
technology based on Native values and worldviews, to reflect those
voices? There is need for a national technology discussion for First
Nations, because cyberspace has increasing power over the future of
Native groups, and it is not yet tied to the institutions and
agencies of government. Information Technology and cyberspace of
themselves are the agents of change, and they are changing us.
I believe that the upcoming generation, the Native
N-Geners from 15-25, and the ones that follow, will be more
influential in the course of First Nations' future than any young
generation before them. We will be leaving the Residential School
intergenerational traumas behind as youth embrace the Net, and make
it their own. Increasingly, adults can only sit by and watch. In the
future, what will the youth of cyberspace, who grew up there, be
like? In Native communities, how much more divorced from traditions
(and the community) might they become?
Next: 7.1 Two Worlds and Tricksters
Return to Table of Contents |